Performance Management System and OKRs in Kenya

Performance Management System and OKRs in Kenya

Performance management fails when it is a once-a-year form. ACCUREX designs a continuous performance management system — goals, measures, conversations and reviews — and trains managers to run it fairly.

Home HR Advisory & Transformation

Performance Management & OKRs

Where the annual appraisal breaks down

Where the annual appraisal breaks down

An appraisal that lands in November, from a form that no manager read before, cannot support a pay decision in December or a termination case in March. The year has moved on, the targets have shifted and no record exists of the conversations that should have shaped the rating. A continuous system — goals set at the start, check-ins through the quarter, calibration at the end — produces the record and the fairness the annual form never did.

What the performance management services deliver

A built-out performance management framework carries six parts:

Organisation and team OKRs

Objectives and key results, aligned to the strategic plan and cascaded to teams.

Role KPIs, scorecards and job profiles

The measures each role is held to, scored on a page each quarter.

Values translated into behavioural standards

The organisation's values written as what managers rate against.

Check-ins, quarterly reviews and calibration

The cadence that keeps the system continuous.

Manager capability training

Coaching, feedback and fair rating practised with real cases.

A practical toolkit, set up on PiPO HRIS

Goals, check-ins and ratings held in one place.

Share headcount, sites and the current performance process, and the design can be scoped from there.

Build your performance system

How a performance system is built

  1. Design

    Objectives, measures, cadence and the fair-rating rules are agreed with leadership before any form is drawn.

  2. Align and cascade

    Organisation OKRs are set, cascaded to teams and translated into role KPIs and scorecards.

  3. Pilot

    The system runs in one or two parts of the business first, with manager training and a review of what landed and what did not.

  4. Review and scale

    The pilot is reviewed, the toolkit is refined and the system is rolled out across the organisation on PiPO HRIS.

How stretching targets stay stretching

OKRs for ambition, KPIs for reliability

Objectives and key results carry the stretch. KPIs carry the baseline the role must deliver. The two combined mean a stretched OKR does not come at the cost of the basics.

Values rated alongside outcomes

A target hit by cutting corners earns a lower overall rating; the behavioural standards are part of the score.

Calibration between managers

Ratings are reviewed across managers each quarter, so one lenient scorer does not quietly inflate ratings elsewhere.

Where Kenyan law shapes performance management

A performance system that drives a termination has to meet the Employment Act, 2007. Four sections carry the most weight for a rating that may support an employer's case:

A reason the employer can prove (s. 43)

The employer must prove the reason for termination; absent that proof, the termination is deemed unfair under s. 45.

Notice and a hearing before termination (s. 41)

Before terminating on grounds of misconduct, poor performance or physical incapacity, the employer must explain the reason in a language the employee understands and consider the employee's representations, with another employee or a union representative present if the employee asks.

Unfair termination (s. 45)

A termination is unfair unless the reason is valid, the reason fairly relates to conduct, capacity, compatibility or operational requirements, and a fair procedure is followed. A continuous service of 13 months is the complaint threshold.

Non-discrimination in rating (s. 5)

Section 5 of the Employment Act prohibits rating decisions that discriminate directly or indirectly on grounds such as sex, race, pregnancy or disability, with narrow exceptions.

The reviewer signs off on the latest wording and any case-law update, so the policy manual can reference the sections safely.

The 90-day pathway to a first credible cycle

Each design is built to deliver a first credible cycle within 90 days: the goals set, the first check-in run, the toolkit live on PiPO HRIS and managers trained on the fair-rating practice. Credible here means a cycle that would stand up to a board review or an unfair-termination claim, not a form that has been filled in.

Who builds a performance system with ACCUREX

Multi-branch retailers, distributors, financial-services firms and growing corporates engage ACCUREX for employee performance management when:

  • A once-a-year form is not driving the business, and strategy does not reach the branch floor.
  • OKRs were introduced without landing, and nobody can show the current state.
  • A performance-based termination was lost or settled, and a safer process is needed.
  • A pay or promotion decision is coming, and the ratings behind it will not stand up to scrutiny.

Target buyers

Multi-branch retailers, distributors, financial-services firms and growing corporates.

Performance management questions answered

How is a performance management system different from an appraisal form?

An appraisal is a single event, usually annual. A performance management system is the full continuous cycle: goals set up front, check-ins through the quarter, calibration at the end and the record that supports pay and promotion decisions.

OKRs set the stretch and the direction. KPIs set the baseline the role must deliver whatever the stretch. Values translate behavioural standards into the rating. Combined, the three stop a stretched goal being hit by cutting corners or by neglecting the basics.

Stretch targets live in OKRs, so the baseline KPIs cannot be dropped to hit them. Ratings include a values score, so a target hit badly scores worse. Calibration across managers each quarter stops one lenient scorer from distorting the overall ratings.

Design, cascade, pilot and the first check-in run within 90 days, with manager training and the toolkit live on PiPO HRIS. Credible means a cycle that would stand up to a board review or an unfair-termination claim, not a form that has been filled in.

Check-ins are short, frequent one-to-ones on the goals and the work. Quarterly reviews score the quarter's goals and the behavioural standards. Calibration sits across managers after the quarterly review, so ratings are compared and extremes get challenged before they land.

Coaching real cases, giving feedback that lands, running a check-in that is not a status update, and rating people fairly against evidence. Managers practise the conversations in the training, not only read about them.

By showing a documented reason (s. 43), notice and a hearing before termination (s. 41), a fair procedure (s. 45) and no discrimination in the rating (s. 5). Each one is produced as a by-product of the cycle, not reconstructed after a case opens.

Goals, check-ins and ratings sit on PiPO HRIS, with calibration views for leadership. The configuration follows the design agreed in the first stage, so the system runs the process rather than imposing its own.

Organisation OKRs cascade from the strategic plan, so the targets at the branch floor are the plan at ground level. Ratings link to pay through the salary structure Job Evaluation & Reward builds, so a stronger quarter is reflected rather than argued.

Yes. The design stage audits the current system first and often retains the useful parts (an existing OKR set, a working KPI library, a trained manager cohort). The pilot then tests the refreshed version in one or two parts of the business before scaling.

Contact Now
LinkedIn Email